Chapter 4 KCQ's
Step 1
Chapter 4 – Analysing Financial
Statements
Key Concepts and Questions
I had not
considered the idea of capital markets as trading in future expectations but
that explains them so well. Factories
could only hope to make a product as flawless as an ocean makes fish. It is much more challenging to foresee the
exact outcome of an equity investment. I can see the importance of consulting
with financial statements as a way of evaluating the future through looking at
the past. A way of being aware of
contingencies that are involved in the return of an investment, using an
educated estimate.
Another concept
I established is the framework or structure of a firm using Discounted Cash Flow,
DCF and the economic profit. I was so
unfamiliar with these terms, yet it makes sense to be able to view how cash
invested has been used and generated. I understand that the DCF is a comparison
of the cost of an investment with value of cash expected to be generated in the
future. The economic profit (opportunity
cost) is still somewhat difficult to grasp. My understanding is that economic
profit attempts to measure the creation of wealth that exceeds the cost of the
amount of capital invested. I’m still
not sure how it does this.
I realise
that separating the operational and financial activities of a firm gives a
better indication of the performance of the main operation of the business. Another key aspect, the return on net
operating assets, RNOA, is the amount of capital employed and breaking it into
profitability (how much value is created) and efficiency (how much effort is
needed to create that value). I believe
it is somehow related to the payment of dividends. I found this link helpful in
clarifying.
“Weighted
average cost of capital (WACC) is the average rate of return a company expects to compensate all its different
investors. The weights are the fraction of each financing source in the
company's target capital structure.” http://www.investinganswers.com/financial-dictionary/financial-statement-analysis/weighted-average-cost-capital-wacc-2905
Free Cash
Flow, FCF = C – I. I view this as a relationship between the
cash generated from sales and the investment back into the firm’s operating assets
or those assets which create the firm’s income. This is important for the firm’s future
capacity to generate cash and in turn, create more profit. What is the difference between the cost of capital
and the amount of capital?
Calculating
RNOA = OI/NOA, operating income (earnings) divided by net operating assets, a
direct measure of “value add.” I see
this as highlighting the amount of income generated by the operating
assets. I find ΔNOA (change in net operating assets) = C (capital outlays), somewhat
confusing. I think it means the amount
of capital invested in purchasing more operating assets. I revised chapter 3.4 and I can see now that
the value of an investment is more than dividends, it’s about future earnings
too.
I understand that the operating income (OI) is cash
generated from the operating activities, those activities that involve the
product, customers and suppliers and not financing activities which are related
to the debt and equity markets. For my
comapany that would be the revenue from generating electricity rather than
interest earned. The difference between
the ΔNOA (change in net operating assets) and the operating assets would show
how much money the business has spent on new operating assets! I think I’m
starting to get it! Now I can see what
its meant by capital outlays. It’s not
all about the cash in the bank!
The concept of economic profit is still confusing. I comprehend how the return on net assets and
the amount of operating assets is calculated, but how is the opportunity cost
of capital measured? Why does accounting
leave out the cost of capital? I do
understand that once capital is invested, it can’t be invested anywhere
else. But how do we measure the
opportunity cost, the cost of if we invested in something else? I can assume that cash flow and dividends
have something in common with economic profit, as they seem to be some sort of
measure of money earnt. My perception of
a business now is that it can have cash in the bank, create dividends and
capital can be reinvested to create future profits. Is there more to it than that?
It seems
obvious that operating activities, employees, customers, suppliers agreements
are the main contributors to a firm’s value.
This is a powerful way of viewing the business as it signifies how much
assets are working. This is the reason
the firm is in business! I suppose it is
like a Kinder surprise, where the finances are soon eaten away only to be left
with a small toy. Separating these from
the financial activities, which relate to decisions about financial structure, equity
investors and debt investors would give a better picture of how much earnings
should be retained and how much to allocate to dividends.
This is the
whoa bit. I had to slow down and re-read
this quite a few times. So here goes, the net operating assets show operating
revenue, the net financial obligations show operating expenses and the
difference is the operating income. Net
financial assets are where finances are saved and are not spent on the
operation of the business. It is usual
for a business to have a net financial obligation (NFO), the debt related with
the ‘equity markets, (d) (dividend payments, share issues and share buybacks)
and net cash flow with debt investors (F) (net interest payments and the
repayment and issue of debt).’ The
connection with NFO and the NFA are the movements shown in the (C) cash flow
from operations and (I) the net cash invested.
Which is FCF = C – I or represented as (OI) operating income less (ΔNOA) the change in net operating assets!
The Ryman example really helped to make sense by using numbers and how
to apply these formulas. I can see the
debt incurred to pay dividends and finance obligations, a clear transfer of
values between operating and financial activities. Although the operating activities are
primary, I realise that the financial activities are important too, as they are
primarily used to support the business in an uncertain market.
The restated
statement of equity, our first glimpse at the comprehensive income. The ‘dirty surplus’ amounts of revenue and
expenses that are not shown in the income statement. My initial reaction was ‘where are they
then?” and “what are they?” I still don’t know if I could recognise a “dirty
surplus” in a dark alley! It looks like
they show up in the statement of comprehensive income and are hidden in the
balance sheet in the equity amount, which makes some sort of sense. I think it
is the amount of other comprehensive income, which is in a separate statement,
although I’m not completely sure.
I realise
that learning is a social activity and I’m very thankful for all the
interactions I’ve had to complete this assignment. The restated balance sheet or in for my
company the statement of financial position purpose is to find the operating
assets (NOA) and identify the financial assets (NFA) or (NFO) financial
obligation, which is more common. The cash aspect is significant as some of it
can be operating, money used to pay wages and suppliers for example or financial,
money saved for a rainy day. I see this
as being a way to show how the operating assets are operating and also how much
debt has the firm. The difference
between the NOA from concurrent years, represents the change in NOA or how many
more assets have been acquired. This is the beginning of understanding how the
firm intends to generate future profits.
The restated
income statement makes the operating income more evident. The tax attribute is very important to a
business. There can be serious legal
consequences if this is not properly represented. I see how this can help influence a firms
decisions to reduce its tax expense and take advantage of the tax benefit, as the
comprehensive operating income is clearly separated from the comprehensive net
profit.
I can
understand that profit per dollar of sales is considered the main accounting
driver. Profitability is how much profit a firm makes from each dollar of
sales. I can kind of see similarities in
the contribution margin with the profit margin. The RNOA is how the operating
income relates to the operating assets and matching it to sales, how well the
invested assets are doing, and a measure of performance. How much profit you make for each dollar
invested is important too. After all, the reason for investing is to get more
out than what you put in, the economic profit. While this makes sense to me, my company’s
calculations don’t seem to add up. What am I missing? I find this part the most confusing.
Contact Energy
NOA = (4980
+ 4891)/2
= 4936
RNOA = PM
(OI/sales) x ATO (sales/NOA) RNOA =
259(OI) / 4963(NOA)
= (259/2537) x (2537/4936) = 5.21%
= 5.24% (this does not seem
right)
Economic
profit = (5.24% - 8.9%) x 4936
= confusion!
I have a lot
more to learn on this and it seems very important.
Efficiency, another
key accounting driver, ATO = Sales/NOA, is the amount of sales made from each
dollar of net operating assets. I like
how the inverse is useful to consider the amount to allocate to operating
assets, 1/ATO = NOA/Sales. Another key
concept is the interactions between the profit margin and asset turnover. It’s like a monitoring system of the assets
in relation to the creation of profit.
It indicates the value added to the investment of assets. This is important for the growth of the
business, not only to support the increase of product but to also maintain
sustainability.
Contact Energy
ATO =
2537/4936
= 0.51times
Conclusion