Tuesday, 30 July 2019

KCQ's Chapter 3


ACCT13017 KCQ’s Chapter 3


I have a vague recollection of studying ratio analysis in grade 12, quite some time ago now. It had something to do with the strength of a firm’s assets, profit margin and ability to pay creditors which kind of reflected the strength of the firm. I don’t recall a framework or even testing those ratios to provide evidence of their usefulness. It will be enlightening to learn something worthwhile with a proven formula that can used reliably. Over the years I have seen the progression of accounting go through changes as society demands and legislation commands. The focus on t accounts and journals entries has vastly changed due to technology and even becoming less and less important as they can be generated with a touch of a button or a swipe of the screen. The term profit maximisation was widely used as an aspirational goal for all firms as well as a reason for doing what they do and proving that what they do works. Warren Buffet can prove what he does works, and I’ll be forever grateful for his insights. However, we need to apply all that theory and foresight subjectively in order to gain its benefit.


It seems to me that the ability to at least identify whether a corporation will fail in the future has some usefulness to equity investors. However, the real prize is finding that ‘white whale’, that investment that will give the unprecedented returns in the forthcoming period and way into the future. The ratios I have identified so far are the price/earnings ratio, profit margin (profit/sales), turnover (sales/total assets), interest coverage (number of times earnings before interest and tax exceed a firm’s interest expense) and debt to equity ratio. How can we use these to predict the future? Will those calculations be reliable enough to make future decisions?

“financial statement analysis should involve us using a firm’s financial statements to help us engage with key aspects of a firm’s economic and business realities”

We need to identify the key drivers a firm and develop an understanding of the economic relationships that affect those drivers. The financial statements can show the areas of focus in a company then we can start to think about how future changes might affect these areas and make some predictions. The further I read into this unit the more I realise how understanding business finance would be an advantage. Regardless, I’m sure I can make the necessary connections of accounting and finance to assess my company. It may require some thinking outside the box to discover the key economic and business drivers and make connections to the possibilities of changes in the future.
I am wondering what analysts, Lawrence Brown, Andrew Call, Michael Clement and Nathan Sharp mean by “reflect consistent reporting choices over time”. I understand that economic realties are backed by sustainable operating cash flows (the ability to finance operations consistently) but, what do they mean by reporting choices? It seems to me that in some ways we aren’t just predicting the numbers, we need to predict human behaviour as well. The ability for a firm to adapt to the ever-changing wants people demand. I many connections to my marketing studies and always thought that strategic marketing should involve some sort of financial analysis. It also occurred to me that the value of a firm is difficult to pin point. Therefore, personal judgements are made to ascertain the present value and the potential value in your own opinion, rather than someone else’s.


I always believed that although all businesses are unique, they all have one thing in common, profit maximisation. It seems ridiculous now to compare any two businesses as alike and that all they are interested in is the bottom line. The value lies with the individual and an individual firm. It is far more logical to find connections to your own values and the businesses in order to make sense of the economic reality. Once we derive a sense of the business and economic reality, we can start to make predictions about the future returns or dividends, our investment might yield.


Forecasting Dividends, Cash Flows or Earnings


Accounting is a universal language, apart from the USA, there are standards which are adhered to worldwide, forming a neutral basis for comparison. It’s almost like making money talk!

Equity Value = Present Value of Expected Future Dividends

The Dividend Discount Model:

Equity value = DIV1 + DIV2 + DIV3 + …
                             ρE        ρE2     ρE3  
DIVt = expected future dividends (t=year)
pE = the cost of capital (discount rate incorporating opportunity cost incurred anticipating dividend payment)

Of course, theoretically firms can last indefinitely, they are not people defined by mortality. I’m not sure how we would determine the expected lifetime of a firm, and what to include as a terminating dividend? I learned in company law that shareholders legally cannot force the payment of a dividend, it can only be the decision of the board. This is quite confusing when thinking we can predict future dividends as we have no influence on that decision. Share types have always confused me, along with share performance. It is kind of relieving that any transaction between the firm and it’s equity investors will simply be referred to as ‘net dividends’.

Discounted Cash Flows

Dividends (d) = Operating cash flow (C) – Capital outlays (I) + Net cash flow from debt owners (F)
                         = Free cash flow (FCF) + Net cash flow from debt owners (F)

Therefore:

FCF = Operating cash flow (C) – Capital Outlays (I)
d = FCF + F
FCF = d – F

It makes sense to relate free cash flow to dividends as firms would not consider a dividend payment without cash available. Therefore, we need to see how cash flows into and out of the business to gain an idea of how our investment is being employed and the expectation of its future value. I like that this approach discounts forecasting the firm’s dividend policy and focuses on the value of equity instead. It does seem complicated applying all these formulas, so I may have to do yet more review of previous units to cement them to memory.

Equity value = DIV1 + DIV2 + DIV3 + …   
                            ρE         ρE2      ρE3       
                        = (C-I)1* + (C-I)2* + (C-I)3*+… - Value of Debt       
WACC WACC2 WACC3 * FCFt = (C – I) t = d – F (Weighted average cost of capital)

The cost of operations for a firm is the cost of capital! This is what is costs a firm to function, to be in business. How to we find the value of debt? And, what is the simplified assumption adopted to value the free cash flow beyond the forecast period adopted? This all sounds very complicated and not simple at all. Ok, I understand that dividends are a transfer of value, not value creation. Ah, lightbulb moment, free cash flow is a transfer of value between a firm’s operating and financial activities. The drivers are cash flow from operations and net cash invested in operating assets! It seems ages ago since we restated a company’s financial statements and now its beginning to all make sense! We need to understand why a company would be investing its cash into operating assets and the intention of creating value for its equity investors. It’s kind of like the company investing in itself, to promote growth and future profits but also utilising the available capital and making it work.

Economic Profit

BV1 = BV0 + CI1 – DIV1
DIV1 = BV0 – BV1 + CI1

“The book value (BV) of equity in any year can only be increased from the previous year’s level by earning Comprehensive income (CI) or be reduced by the amount of net dividends paid to its equity investors.”

VE = BV0 + (CI1-ρEBV0) + (CI2-ρEBV1) + … + (CIt-ρEBVt-1) + BVt        
                              ρE                  ρE2                              ρEt        ρEt
       = BV0 + AE1  + AE2  + … + AEt  +  BVt   
                      ρE     ρE2             ρEt       ρEt

AEt = Abnormal Earnings in year t = CIt - [(ρE -1)BVt-1]. Abnormal earnings (AE) is the difference between Comprehensive income (CI), a measure of the accounting earnings of a firm, and the cost of the capital the firm uses to earn that return ((ρE –1) x BVt-1).
AOIt = Abnormal operating income in year t = OIt-[(WACC-1) x BVt-1]; and WACC is the weighted average cost of capital or the cost of capital for a firm’s operations. Operating income is the earnings on a firm’s total assets (or enterprise) independent of how it is funded by debt or equity (that is, it is before deducting interest) and is after deducting tax.

The Value of Equity:

VE = BV0 + PV of AE (or Abnormal Operating Income)

“This draws on the same theoretical base as the discounted dividend model: the value of equity is the present value of expected future dividends.” 

Without the bother of dividend policy or cash re-invested in operations. Oh wow, what a powerful concept! Being able to focus on just those aspects that are potentially creating value is very exciting! I am wondering what those aspects will be revealed from my company.

KCQ's Chapter 2


ACCT13017 KCQ’s Chapter 2



Life has many different journeys. The beginning of my degree started off as a Diploma and when I achieved success, I decided to go even further. I reset the goal posts and now I’m almost finished. When I’m done, it will be time to reset the goal posts once more. I guess it’s the same with companies.  With proper analysis and perhaps a little luck, they will achieve their goals and continue with success. It’s all a bit unpredictable, but as with achieving a degree, a bit of study goes a long way to achieving success. It all depends on what you do that adds to the value of the destination.
It’s all very subjective, what adds value to me? To me, the investment into gaining this degree means increasing the value of my family’s quality of life, so highly valued. Businesses would be focusing their efforts on the areas they value too. Could this reflect bias in their accounting methods and distort an outsider’s view? Where do we look for subtlety’s indicating predisposition?


Carpe diem – Seize the day!  One of my favourite lines from “Dead Poet’s Society”.  We have only today to react and tomorrow to respond but to succeed, we need strategy. As an investor I would be interested in the current affairs of the company’s industry, the down low on sustainability of the resources the firm needs, who are their rivals and how are they handling things, what are other future possibilities. I want to know the ethics and values of the company organisational culture, their abilities and weaknesses. These are things I would need to consider before investing and make comparisons to my personal alignments. The main goal in mind being to make more than invested and the firm’s capacity to do so.  I can see that a firm’s strategy shows its’ intentions and previous intentions form patterns and patterns form indications of the big picture. From Rymans example, I need to find how the firm is employing leverage from it’s operating liabilities and utilizing net operating assets. I need to study the firm’s ability to sustain its’ intentions. Of course, if they matched Ryman’s ability, it would be very attractive to the investor, well one can dream!


I’m finding the concept of the cost of capital confusing. How on earth do the capital markets use the clearing price when there are unlimited potential uses?  Does this mean equity interests ‘go off’ after just one day if not consumed? I get that investors are buying the future of a firm and guessing that some returns are more likely than others but what is the real guarantee on the expectation of a return? It all seems a very risky business in predicting whether a firm will create value and earning a return greater than the cost of capital we are willing to invest.


What does strategy look like? How would we recognise it in a dark alley? I’m guessing ‘the persistent stuff’ are the things a firm consistently does well, the repetitive daily grind that keeps them going. These are the heart and soul of the business and our focus for research. Then look at the competing environment and how they stack up when faced with the same challenges. How does the firm add value for its customers? Who is their target market?


Plan, Ploy, Pattern, Position or Perspective


I’m familiar with the 4 P’s of marketing, product, price, place and promotion, to some extent I can relate. Every business needs a plan, a direction and a map to get there. So, it makes sense that a plan would include the business intention of addressing the market, its competitors and challenges it faces. In contrast, a ploy would be countermeasures to try and outsmart the competition. This would involve creating barriers to new competitors from entering the market and in general make it difficult for the competition take market share. Kind of like how Apple protects their technology and limits accessibility to prevent copycats. Patterns may be more difficult to ascertain, without in-depth research. Keeping with the Apple example, I think their pattern strategy would be to constantly keep updating, keep the customer up to date with the latest and greatest. In this respect, I would expect a lot of Apple capital would be employed in developing new technologies and thus creating the value add for their customers.


The key to positioning is too home in on the aspects of the firm’s environment and match them with strategies to give them a competitive edge. This is the firm’s ability to provide defence mechanisms against the competition and future challenges. After discussing this point with Dr Martin, I realised that position is much more than market share. It’s about stance on issues that affect the company’s values, it’s about their position in the community, industry and the world! It’s a lot more challenging than I expected and will be difficult to apply to my company.


Perspective is more difficult to define. It seems to be attitude, personality and integrity, almost like the Myers Briggs test for companies. How does this affect their ability to make decisions? What determines the organisations behaviour? Perspective is people!!! It’s about the personality of the people in charge, the decision makers. Every leader puts their personal touch on the organisation they lead. This means we need to know the people, their values, personality and ethics and how that reflects in the business. Richard Branson comes to mind with his well-known ethos of “Train people well enough so they can leave, treat them well enough so they don’t want to.” This tells me his business is willing to train employees to a high standard, then remunerate them as a reward for their hard work. There is something to be admired in that.


I recall Net Present value but alas my memory has diminished how to calculate. My understanding is that positive net present value relates to the firm’s ability to generate future returns on equity greater than the cost of capital. I definitely need a refresher on how to calculate this. I cannot even fathom how to calculate the infinite possibilities relating to opportunity cost, but I can see the importance. The comparison of one decision made against another not taken can cost a firm dearly and show us how well decisions are being made. This determines the decisions made in the future and the strength of the firms’ capability to add value to an investor.


I have learned previously that judgements and assumptions can be made using depreciation and revaluation to manipulate true value. Regardless of rules and regulations, firms will always use the best filters to present the best picture. Much like a photo on Instagram, the reality may be somewhat different, but the intent is similar, the poster presents the picture they want you to see. We need to be vigilant and scrupulous to find the underlying truths.

Wednesday, 17 July 2019

KCQ’s Preface and Chapter 1


ACCT13017 KCQ’s Preface and Chapter 1

Preface:
“Relying too heavily on other people’s opinions can damage our sense of reality.”
- Derek Rowntree

Absolutely, we need facts to create our own opinions and make decisions to suit ourselves. You only get one life, it’s important to make it your own, not someone else’s. Giving people the information returns the power dynamic to be able to control their own lives, in my opinion, the way it should be. We are all masters of our own destiny and should be entitled to accurate relevant information to make decisions to make the most of it.  What does it mean to conduct a fundamental analysis ourselves? What adds value to a genuinely interested stakeholder and why? I want to know, what adds value in a business and how does accounting help?

Chapter 1: Focus on Reality
It makes sense that investors will want to invest in a business that is doing well and would reflect so in the value of stock. Therefore, there is little need to rely on share price as an accurate measure of how well a business is doing, it is simply a reward for doing well in the past. But what of the future?
Fundamental Analysis:
From the investor’s perspective, fundamental analysis of the financial statements is a centrally forming assessment of the personal connection to a firm. A basis or a start with which judgements can be made according to what is valuable to an individual.
I’m seeing a lot of encouragement to make our own judgements and to connect our personal experiences. I can’t help but feel this is the why and how a person begins a business, invests in a venture and creates their own business agenda and what adds value not only in money terms but life fulfilment.
Efficient market hypothesis, finance theory? I’m curious about learning more and avoiding errors!

A Framework:
It seems that learning the discounted cash flow and discounted economic frameworks are the first important concepts to master and incorporate into a conceptual map. Focus needs to be on understanding the operating activities of a firm. Somehow, I must build a mental picture to create a mind map to manage an effective and efficient way to analyse financial statements, with a personal connection to draw on those skills time and time again and make excellent business decisions, personally beneficial.

 Personal and imprecise:
So, how do I currently think businesses add value, what does value adding even mean to me? I have gleaned form the study guide that a good financial statement analysis is insightful and convincing, it has to inspire confidence and be intelligent. Although using the frameworks give a precise measure of value for a firm, it is not foolproof, but it does provide a “safety margin”, if we make good judgements and assessments. Value is subjective, ‘one man’s trash is another man’s treasure’.

Economic Profit:
“Return on net operating assets (RNOA) is Operating income after tax (OI) divided by the Net operating assets invested in the business (including both working capital and non-current assets such as Property, plant and equipment).”
The opportunity cost is virtually impossible to measure. There are so many alternatives and missed opportunities available how on earth can one consider them all and waste the opportunity of time doing something else? I decided 6 years ago to embark on my accounting journey to gain qualifications firstly in a diploma and later a Bachelor of Business. I could have studied something else, Radiology for example, or simple TAFE courses, found employment or continued doing what I was doing. The list of possibilities was endless, but I analysed my options, placed my ultimate desires at centre and created a mental map of how to achieve that goal. I run my family as a business of sorts, every investment is completely personal so it’s important to make good choices. It also involves taking a risk but not without calculation and safety net.
“Also, the more a firm can invest in its Net operating assets at returns above its costs of capital, the more value a firm can create. In other words, growth creates value as long as RNOA is greater than the cost of capital on new investments of Net operating assets that a firm can make.”

Free Cash Flow:
“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

  - Sun Tzu, The Art of War

A firms operating income less our net investment in the business for a period – change in net operating assets.

FCF = OI - ∆NOA

Omg light bulb!!! Of course, different firms need different amounts to generate profit. Using less capital to create the same income means better utilization of resources!!!! This makes the amount invested in the future more valuable!!! Of course, these are projections whereas Economic profit is a direct measurement, in real time, using the firm’s accounting profit compared to the cost of capital. It’s important to note that profitability and growth are two vastly different concepts. I’m starting to recall this from previous studies.

Operating and Financial Activities:
Breaking a firm’s financial statements in bit to analyse key aspects using the DCF and Economic frameworks….what key aspects???  I guess you can ignore how a firm is financed, that is equity (invested capital) and debt (borrowed capital) because in the end the result is how much you have to work with.  Separating the operating activities from the financial activities can show where the value is created…or not. I am unfamiliar with Modigliani and Miller theorems but embrace the challenge of new financial theorem aspects. 

Many Points of View:
I read Warren Buffets letter to his grandchildren many years ago and I don’t really remember much, but he does seem to defy the logic of the efficient market hypothesis.  If it directly relates to me as a relevant stakeholder I would take more notice. I look forward to taking the perspective of an equity investor and exploring just what’s of value to me in that role.  I do recall from previous units that successful businesses must take into account all relevant stakeholders, not just shareholders points of view, and remembering that we are also part of a community that will be affected by business decisions.  The financial statements need to be useful to these stakeholders and accessible. So, how do you access this information and how can you be sure it contains useful reliable information needed?

What it Takes:
Using the past, in the present to predict the future! What a concept! Structuring all the available information to relate to our current realities is quite the skill. It helps to have a guide, a map, a framework. It does seem overwhelming to precisely forecast a firms financial and operating activities using the financial statements. It’s my understanding that the Economic Profit and DCF helps direct our efforts using their current financial information. It will be interesting to analyse how and what this information reflects the decisions our firms make.

Sunday, 7 July 2019

The Light at the End of the Tunnel


Related image

When I first began this journey or rather leap of faith, my at home children were ages 3, 5, 14,14 and 16. Since then 3 more of my gorgeous, resilient chidren have not only graduated highschool, attained higher education certification and acquired viable employment but have left the nest to be fully functioning independant adults!!! I am so proud of them and the leaps and bounds of the younger ones now in grades 3 and 5.  Child rearing itself is a challenge as has been studying but I can see the light at the end of tunnel.  

The time for finding viable employment myself and putting all this hard work to proper purpose is rapidly  approaching. All the HD's, D's, C's and P's won't mean bubkiss but a deep seated ingrained knowledge experience is soul filling and life enriching . This entire journey has required grit and determination and now is no time for slacking. It's kind of poetic to begin this adventure with Dr Turner and have him guide me towards the grand finale. As this subject is the embodiment of all we have learned so far, it's only fitting that the preliminary beginnings start with review.....and Peerwise too😃😃

"A determined soul will do more with a rusty monkey wrench than a loafer will accomplish with all the tools in a machine shop" - Robert Hughes - art critic and author

Friday, 15 September 2017

Step 7

Step 7
EXPLORING THE INVENTORY PRACTICES OF YOUR FIRM

PTB inventory includes aircraft, engines and spare parts as finished goods which are assets held for sale. As well as engines and aircraft undergoing reconditioning or preparation for sale as work in progress and incomplete repair jobs. We can understand that their business isn’t just about selling turbine engines but also complete aircrafts, repairs and maintenance and spare parts. They also list their inventories as current which indicates they expect their value to be realised within 12 months.

The notes state inventories are stated at the lower of cost and net realisable value. Costs are assigned to individual items of stock by specific identification. Net realisable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business less the estimated costs of completion and the estimated costs necessary to make the sale. In line with the accounting standards, the cost includes all direct and indirect costs in relation to prepare the item for sale.

Costs are assigned to individual items of stock by specific identification. Suggesting they use the specific identification method or it is possible. The annual stocktake no doubt involves data matching technology, although a physical identification of aircraft would be obvious. Somewhat different to the stocktakes I did while working at a service station using a pad and a pen and physically observing and recording every drink bottle, chip, lolly and chocolate plus everything else, which would then be matched to sales and stock in storage.  Although it is not exactly identified, the mention of using perpetual growth rates as key assumptions used for value-in-use calculations signifies the perpetual system for inventory recording.

PTB 2014 $19.789 mill write down in the value of group assets with a provision $3.284 mill a strategy driven by issues created by the GFC. From the report: “On 4 November 2013, PTB Group Ltd announced to the market that it would be carrying out a rationalisation of its operations. This significant change in direction for the business drove a change in the valuation assumptions for a range of Group assets, leading to significant write-downs.”
So even though the GFC ended in 2008 the company was still feeling the effects. I guess this kind of accounting helps to protect the business by not only predicting possible future expectations but also making provisions for the actual expectation after it has occurred.

“In the 2015 year, this business will continue to be focused on selling down the current inventory while continuing to support IAP and Emerald’s leased aircraft.” Strategies forecasted to allow for past events and future obligations???
Significant portion of PTB inventory includes spare parts over completed engines.
Their main strategy is “continuing the focus on turning inventory into cash”, which makes sense to generate cash, which is essential for business to continue and to pay debts, wages etc to focus on turning inventory into cash, which is its original intention anyway! This is continuing theme over 2015 and 2016 which sees inventory steadily grow from $18817mil, $21113mil and $21440 respectively.

“In September 2006, it acquired IAP Group for $13.8 million. IAP Group is a Sydney based niche aviation asset management company providing aircraft inventory support”; This looks like a smart move to account for the effects of the GFC but also a complementary acquisition to support their current operations and allow for global expansion. (Hogget etal, 2015) “gross sales margin — the difference between the cost of goods bought from wholesalers and the price the goods are sold to consumers”. So PTB show $18 512mil as cost of goods sold as a credited expense in the profit/loss consolidated income statement, which I know is related to inventory.

Along with a total of $7216mil for impairment of inventory. I didn’t understand what “impairment’ meant, commenting “Impairment of inventory? Is that depreciation, spoilage, wastage???” so I went looking for further information. I found this in the accompanying notes to the financial statements:

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
(j) Impairment of assets Goodwill and intangible assets that have an indefinite useful life are not subject to amortisation and are tested annually for impairment or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that they might be impaired. Other assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is recognised for the amount by which the asset’s carrying amount exceeds its recoverable amount. The recoverable amount is the higher of an asset’s fair value less costs to sell and value in use. For the purposes of assessing impairment, assets are grouped at the lowest levels for which there are separately identifiable cash inflows (cash generating units).
(n) Other financial assets
When an event occurring after the impairment was recognised causes the amount of the impairment loss to decrease the decrease in impairment loss is reversed through the statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income.

Further reading of the textbook explained impairment to be the recoverable amount of writedowns and since this was their cash generating strategy, I began to understand the difference between impairments and depreciation.
The company’s accounting policies seem to align with accounting standards and as yet I have not noticed any significant changes. Their cash generating from writedowns of idle inventory seems to be effective as cash balances rise from $1142mil in 2014 to $3800 in 2015. Although cash dips to $1982 in 2016, this reflects the change in borrowings from $3535mil in 2015 to $1798 in 2016. Equity remains steady over the years with little to no change.


I get the feeling the company discloses everything on the up and up and find nothing too suspicious. 

Tuesday, 12 September 2017


Step 6

Peer feedback


Peer feedback is so important. I interact with people in all sorts of ways to talk about what I’m learning in accounting but by far the most valuable conversations are with my fellow accounting students. Reading people’s blogs is most interesting. Danielle Bradley’s is one of my top 3, followed by Kate Edwards and Anna Towan. I have incorporated there insights into my own. I raised the issue of trust with Danielle and her response highlighted how companies build trust through internal and external controls. I also have regular discussions with Anna Towan about simple foundational definitions such as expenses are results in the decrease in equity from decreases in assets and increases in liabilities and revenues are resulted from increases in equity from increases in assets and decreases in liabilities. Conversations in class discussing the different names of statements such as consolidation reports and comprehensive income reports that are in fact variations of the same thing. These help cement my comprehension of what’s happening in the financial statements and ultimately the Trial Balance. Revenue and expenses are matched for a period of time. It all comes down to the assumptions and judgments a company uses when thinking about the realization of future economic benefits. After all this the very reason they are in business.
The feedback I received helped correct errors and improve the way I wrote this assignment. Donna Condon suggested I expand my company background and include pictures. I really think the pictures help tell the story. I have also taken her advice to relate to my personal experiences. My previous company, Contact Energy, is a completely different industry to aviation and I find it difficult to relate, on some levels; however, the concepts are similar, the strategies are different. So I have included some comparisons at the last minute. This has been a grueling exercise but I do like how it is broken up into manageable size pieces, much like the Trial Balance organizes its accounts!!!
Feedback is so valuable, I realise how much I have learnt from others just by interacting. My excel skills have improved as has my use of social media and my accounting skills are dramatically improved! I think I’m starting to have some fun with accounting and it is not such a daunting task when there are peers to support you.



Anna Towan
2591 pts.
1 week ago
·         0
·         6
Just finished a few minutes ago from the interactive session and learned quite a few valuable things. One thing I learned is that when we understand how our firms interconnect e.g. Balance Sheet connecting with equity and how the financial statements interconnect, we'll be set. I think Lois or maybe Maria pointed this out. I find this information valuable because it has solidified my thoughts that were all over the place like a piece of the puzzle was missing and now it's found. Also, revenue and expenses are temporary accounts while the others such as Balance Sheet is permanent. Which makes so much sense. Anyways, what did you learn if you joined this morning? (2 Aug)
1 week ago
·          
·          
We were put on the spot in the tutorial and asked to define an expense. I'm embarrassed to admit my mental recollection was vague at best. So the study guide definition, which I still constantly refer to is ‘decreases in economic benefits during the accounting period in the form of outflows or depletions of assets or incurrences of liabilities that result in decreases in equity'. This is all subject to assumptions and judgement we make as to how the item is use and how the cost is incurred. I'm constantly amazed in the little foundational building blocks we need to have a better grasp of in order to build on.
1 week ago
Some definitions are a mouthful. Found a shorter definition, expense: An expense is the reduction in value of an asset as it is used to generate revenue. https://www.accountingtools.com/articles/2017/5/6/expense
1 week ago
·          
·          
Brilliant! Just need to remember the definitions for the other 4 elements
1 week ago
LOL! I wonder what exam week will be like. It's been years since sitting an exam
1 week ago
·          
·          
Hi Anna, I've started looking over your step 5 and left some comments on your blog. I absolutely agree Maria's videos are wonderful. Her latest explains the Trial Balance in great detail, I found it invaluable for completing step 5.


Feedback From: Donna Condon                                                
Feedback To: Sharon Field

My Comments
Step 3  
Background information on company



Comments/KCQs

Discussion with others
I really enjoyed reading your Step 3 and I was interested to read that they an Air Craft Engine Manufacturer.  I think it’s great that you discovered that your company is part of bigger group and how they fit into the bigger picture.   I found the background information was written well and contained some interesting information but I thought that you could expand a little more of the background of the company eg:  When was the company foundered and by Who? You could talk about the products your company produces or sells.  Is you company on the Australian Stock Exchange? And you could add few pictures or photos of the company or its products to help your peers connect with your company.  These are only suggestions
I like the fact that you took the time to read the annual report and that you were honest about things you didn’t understand or that confused you.  You could also expend on this part by comparing this term annual report to the company you received last term and commenting on the differences or/and you could compare you annual reports to some of your peers company’s and have a chat about what you and peers have found.
I liked how you have interrupted the financial statements and how you understood that the balance sheet and consolidate statement of changes of equity are interlinked I also loved the way you used the extended accounting equation to work out the consolidated statement of change of equity.  I am a visual person so I need to see it to believe and understand it sometimes.  In regards to overall financial statements I think you could expand on them a little more eg: What was the balance sheet telling you about the company and their performance for the year.  You could also talk about how you had compared your statements and other peer’s financial statements and differences you found between them.   I could not find the discussion or links to your discussions with your peers in your document and maybe you have not updated the document with yet and don’t forget you need to include your thoughts on whether discussing with others either helped or hindered you.
Overall this a step is well written and is on the way to becoming a great step 3.  Well done 😊
Step 4
The recording process
I thought that you had executed the recording process correctly in your excel spreadsheet and you linked your transactions to the income statement correctly.   I could find any errors so well done.  I enjoyed reading how you approached this exercise and the fact that you used your nutrimetics in the transaction as extra income and expenses that was great.  I thought that you answered that questions well. Overall fantastic job 😊
Step 5  
Trial balance
Discussion
You have completed this exercise but I found it difficult to follow your spreadsheet not sure if you have deleted a few lines so I added new work sheet showing the correct way to presentation the information as the version you gave me had the wrong figures against the wrong headings but overall result was correct so I believe it was an error in formatting your spreadsheet.
I could not find your key concepts and questions and discussions with others on step 5 so made you just forgot to send it to me.
Overall
I really enjoyed reading and learning about your company and some of you concerns with the financial statements.  I think one you have fixed up the error in the trial balance and included the discussions with others for both step 3 and 5 will have an excellent assignment. You should be very proud Well done.





Comments:
ASPIRING ACCOUNTAHOLIC Just a blog detailing my adventures of accounting
Sharon: “A company who is responsible for the major infrastructure of a country must have engaged in some trust building exercises. It will be interesting how these relationships are reflected in the financial reports.”
My Reply: “It’s funny you should mention trust as Martin highlights what an importance concept trust is within business. So I would agree that you are correct. Breedon have obviously taken steps to ensure they have the trust of both the employees within their firm, such as ensuring a high level of safety standards, as well as the broader community. This is evident through their interactions with the community and putting into effect mechanisms to ensure their business does not have a significant negative impact on the wider social, environmental and economic well-being of the areas in which they operate. Moreover, due to Breedon displaying a continual growth in their revenue from their daily operations, as evident in their financial reports, I believe this is highly indicative of the trust they have built both internally and externally.”

https://katherinemcgillcqumail.wordpress.com/2017/08/09/step-3-6-the-fulham-shore-plc/
https://onetwothreeaccounting.wordpress.com/2017/07/19/step-2-draft-ready-for-feedback/#comments


Friday, 4 August 2017

ASS#Step 5 Draft

Well, I've learned that you just can't do everything yourself. Sometimes you need to reach out to understand. So that's what I have done. Now I know why most accountants wear glasses and no doubt before the semester is out, I too shall be donning respectable spectacles. The Trial Balance has attracted some errors. I know they're there because it doesn't balance!!!! I know it's just a draft but it is annoying and I want to find out why. For now, I will take a step back, take a deep breath and start from the beginning. Happy to accept any advice please!!!!

This is the spreadsheet link available for editing:

https://1drv.ms/x/s!AtU_KuJ5iHjkghQnVK699gYQDWs6